Theology, Culture, and Miscellany

eschergirls:

ami-angelwings:

eschergirls:

I think Vampirella is still recovering from her fight with a giant crab.

I was using this picture as an example for a post on Escher Girls of the straight male gaze influencing panel construction and how we are forced to view a character from a certain perspective in a scene, and I finally realized what was going on here.
I’ve never really looked at it carefully, I just always thought she was changing or just posing or something.  I only now realized she’s supposed to be morphing her clothes and destroying the house.  But, because it’s just like butt shot, butt shot, butt shot, butt shot, I never picked up on what was going on because the panel focus is so much on her butt and that one shot of her body that it’s hard to know what exactly is going on, especially since she’s barely moving, it’s just static butt shots (and the same one copy pasted 3 times at the end). The main focus was to give us butt shots & a full body shot featuring her boobs and crotch.
Not just can it be distracting to constantly have to see things through this sort of “gaze”, but sometimes it can really detract from your immersion and understanding of a scene if you feel like the “camera” is just so focused on looking at women’s butts and breasts that the other, often important, storytelling elements are being ignored.

Just a follow up/example on the last post with the video about the straight male gaze.

In case anybody ever asks you to explain what “male gaze” is in media, this page was made for you. And for the male gaze. Mostly the male gaze, honestly.

eschergirls:

ami-angelwings:

eschergirls:

I think Vampirella is still recovering from her fight with a giant crab.

I was using this picture as an example for a post on Escher Girls of the straight male gaze influencing panel construction and how we are forced to view a character from a certain perspective in a scene, and I finally realized what was going on here.

I’ve never really looked at it carefully, I just always thought she was changing or just posing or something.  I only now realized she’s supposed to be morphing her clothes and destroying the house.  But, because it’s just like butt shot, butt shot, butt shot, butt shot, I never picked up on what was going on because the panel focus is so much on her butt and that one shot of her body that it’s hard to know what exactly is going on, especially since she’s barely moving, it’s just static butt shots (and the same one copy pasted 3 times at the end). The main focus was to give us butt shots & a full body shot featuring her boobs and crotch.

Not just can it be distracting to constantly have to see things through this sort of “gaze”, but sometimes it can really detract from your immersion and understanding of a scene if you feel like the “camera” is just so focused on looking at women’s butts and breasts that the other, often important, storytelling elements are being ignored.

Just a follow up/example on the last post with the video about the straight male gaze.

In case anybody ever asks you to explain what “male gaze” is in media, this page was made for you. And for the male gaze. Mostly the male gaze, honestly.

Source: eschergirls

Text

The sermon series continues! Sermon #3 of 6…

Read More

Text

    God’s grace and peace be with you.
    Today I’m preaching my second sermon in a series on Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Last week, as you recall, I gave some introductory information about the Christians living in the region known as Galatia, about letter-writing in the ancient world, and about Paul’s concerns regarding the Galatian Christians. Paul greeted the Galatians and jumped straight into admonishing them, accusing them of abandoning the gospel.
    This morning, we pick up right where we left off. Paul has said that the Galatians are turning away from the true gospel to a false gospel; now Paul is going to defend the gospel he preached and his own credentials in preaching it.
    He begins right away, saying, “I want you to know that the gospel I preached is not something that humans made up.  I did not receive it from any human being, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.”

    …Whoa. Listen to that again. Paul says, “The gospel I preached is not something that humans made up.” Well, we’d probably all say that. We’d probably all agree that the gospel we believe in was not just made up. But Paul goes on to say, “I did not receive it from any human being, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.”
    Imagine for a moment that I got up on a Sunday morning to preach a sermon, and I started my sermon by saying, “What I am telling you came to me directly from God. I didn’t learn it in seminary, I didn’t hear about it in Sunday school or from my own pastors growing up or from my family. I didn’t read it in a book. In fact, I didn’t learn it from any human being but by direct revelation from the divine.”
    Now, there are some preachers out there who will say just that, but I think in most Lutheran churches, if a pastor said that, you’d be pretty concerned. You’d want to know if it was really true or if your pastor was delusional or trying to manipulate you. In fancy theological terms, we call that a hermeneutic of suspicion. In plain English, it means that we have a healthy skepticism about faith claims. We evaluate what we hear, testing it to make sure it’s trustworthy. And that’s a good thing.

    If I said I got my sermon directly from God, you might be skeptical. But Paul is saying just that. Paul is saying that the gospel he preached came to him directly from Jesus Christ. He is not preaching a gospel of human origin. The gospel he is preaching is divine.
    In order to explain what he means, Paul begins to recount his call story. We read another version of this story in the book of Acts, although that version was not written by Paul himself. Here in Galatians we hear it in Paul’s own words. In any case, the major points are the same: Paul was Jewish, a zealous follower of the Law. He was persecuting Christians, these people he viewed as heretics for proclaiming Jesus as the Messiah, the Christ. In fact, Paul was well-known among both Jewish and Christian communities for his passionate opposition to Christian believers.
    But then, as Paul says, “God, who set me apart from birth and called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me.” God made Paul an apostle, a witness to Jesus Christ along with Peter and the other apostles. And Paul’s status, his calling to be an apostle, did not come from human origin or require human approval.
    Paul says he did not go to Jerusalem to consult the Jewish Christian leaders who were there, the other apostles. He immediately went away from Judea, away from the territory where Jesus had ministered during his life, and into regions where the gospel could be proclaimed to Gentiles.
    It was only after three years of ministry that Paul went to Jerusalem and met Peter and James, the brother of the Lord. And he didn’t go to them for approval of the work he was doing. He didn’t need their approval. His calling, his credentials, came from God.

    If you continue to read into the first part of chapter 2 of Galatians, which we will not hear in our lectionary readings, you will learn that Paul went back to Jerusalem after another fourteen years, to tell the Christians in Jerusalem about the ministry he had been doing among the Gentiles. At that point, Paul says, the Jerusalem church recognized his ministry: “When they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel for the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel for the circumcised, and when James and Cephas and John, who were acknowledged pillars, recognized the grace that had been given to me, they gave to Barnabas and me the right hand of fellowship, agreeing that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised.”
    Again, Paul does not need the approval of the Jerusalem Christians. His call is validated by its divine origin. However, the cooperation between Paul and the Jerusalem Christians demonstrates God’s power in spreading the gospel. The community of Christians in Jerusalem recognizes the grace Paul has received, and it is decided that Paul will continue to minister to the Gentiles while the Jerusalem church ministers to the circumcised, that is, the Jewish people.
    Paul’s story is the story of God’s power. Paul’s authority comes from God’s authority. Paul’s credentials to teach the gospel come from God’s calling him to that ministry. Everything Paul is and everything Paul does reflects back on the work of God.
    When Paul began his ministry, bringing the gospel to the Gentiles, he did not seek approval from the Jerusalem Christians. But they heard about him. They heard about the work he was doing. And the report that was spread about him was this: “The man who formerly persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy.”
    Paul, the man who formerly persecuted Christians for being heretics, is now preaching the faith in Christ that he once tried to destroy. And why is Paul doing this? Not for popularity or fame or power. Not because it makes him look good or because he is trying to please people. Paul’s life made a complete 180°, from persecuting Christians to proclaiming the gospel, because of God’s transformative power.

    God has the power to feed thousands with a few loaves of bread and a few fish. God has the power to make the blind see and the lame walk. God has the power to make a dead man come to life again. God has the power to defeat death itself.
    God has the power to take Christianity’s most determined enemy and make him an apostle. God has the power to transform lives, to transform the world.
    When the Jewish Christians heard about Paul’s transformation, that he was preaching the gospel he had tried to destroy… they praised God. The Christians in Jerusalem praised God because they saw the results of God’s transformative power.
    Paul was transformed by God’s power, and people praised God when they heard about it. Because of God’s power, Paul became an apostle for Jesus Christ.
Because of God’s power, the gospel was preached to the Gentiles. Because of God’s power, Christianity spread throughout the world.
    If it weren’t for God’s transforming power, none of us would be here in church this morning. God’s power has transformed our lives, just as it transformed Paul’s life. We might not have quite as dramatic a story as Paul did, but we have been transformed nonetheless. And when we witness what God’s transformative power has done, we too should praise God. Amen.

Text

    God’s grace and peace be with all of you.
    Today is the first in a six-week series of sermons on Paul’s letter to the Galatians. This is both an important letter and a good one to dig into because there is so much information confined in a few short chapters. Most of the central ideas in Paul’s theology can be found in the letter to the Galatians, and we will have an opportunity to explore those ideas in the next few weeks.
    My first sermon today will cover some of the context behind the letter—to whom Paul was writing this letter and why. So it may not be my most riveting sermon ever, but bear with me. This information is going to help us out as we work through the letter.

    First of all, who were the Galatians? Paul traveled around to many parts of the known world, establishing Christian communities in various places. As he moved on, he would write letters to communities, usually those he had visited before, to provide instruction, encouragement, and admonishment to the Christians in these places.
    Many of Paul’s letters are written to Christian communities in particular cities—Philippi, Corinth, Rome, and so forth. Galatia, however, is not an individual city. It is a region in modern-day Turkey.
    Paul is writing to the churches in Galatia, multiple communities in various towns and cities. These Christians may have been Roman citizens. They were definitely Gentiles—meaning they weren’t Jewish. And that is going to be very important to understand what’s going on with the Galatians.

    Keep in mind that Jesus and his disciples were all Jewish. Most of the people Jesus healed and fed and preached to were Jewish. There are a few notable exceptions—the Roman centurion in our gospel reading, for example—but mostly, Jesus’ ministry was with and among Jewish people.
    On Pentecost, when the apostles spoke in many languages, they were still speaking as Jews to other Jews. But if you continue to read the book of Acts, you find that the gospel of Jesus Christ begins to extend beyond communities of Jewish people and into communities of Gentiles.
    Paul’s whole ministry is about bringing the gospel to the Gentiles. We’ll hear more about that next week. But for today, let’s just note that the Galatians are Gentiles who have heard the good news about Jesus Christ and become Christians.

    The next thing we need to know is something about ancient letter-writing. How many of you learned formal letter-writing format in school? So you know that letters require certain elements. You have the date, you say who the letter is from, your address, a salutation, the body of the letter, et cetera.
    Even in the technological age, there are certain formats that we stick to. When you write an email, it’s got a From: line, a To: line, a subject, and a body. There are components that go into the message.
    In Paul’s time, there was a particular format for writing letters. When I looked at Paul’s letters with our confirmands, we compared the first few verses of many of these letters.


    1 Corinthians begins, “Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and our brother Sosthenes, to the church of God that is in Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, together with all those who in every place call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
    Philippians begins, “Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, to all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with the bishops and deacons: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.” They all start in these terms, and we heard the same thing in the first verses of Galatians today.
    Letters in Paul’s time followed a particular format. First, the letter would say who was writing, who the letter was from. Then the letter’s recipients are named, and there is a greeting. In Galatians, it says, “Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead—  and all the brothers with me” (that’s who the letter is from), “to the churches in Galatia” (that’s who the letter is for): “Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ,  who gave himself for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father,  to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen” (that’s the greeting).
    All Paul’s letters start out this way, following this format. After the names of the senders and recipients and the greeting, there is another introductory element necessary to any letter in the ancient world: Thanksgivings. Letters are supposed to begin with thanksgivings. If I were writing a letter to my husband in the ancient world, I’d write, “From Jennifer, to my dear husband Steven: grace be with you. I give thanks to you for doing the dishes last night, and for helping me take the dog for a walk…” Then I’d get onto the business of the letter.
     Paul writes some beautiful thanksgivings in his letters. In the letter to the Philippians, after the greeting, Paul writes, “I thank my God every time I remember you, constantly praying with joy in every one of my prayers for all of you.”
    But if you look at the letter to the Galatians, we read, “Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead—  and all the brothers with me, to the churches in Galatia: Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ,  who gave himself for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father,  to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.” (That’s the sender, recipient, and greeting.) Then it continues, “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel.” That doesn’t sound like thanksgiving.
    Paul is supposed to begin his letter with a thank you. When the Galatians heard this letter read in their assembly, they would have been expecting words of thanks. Instead, they hear, “I am astonished!”

    The point of all this is that Paul is skipping the thanksgivings. He is breaking the format and jumping right in to scolding the Galatians for abandoning the gospel. He is really angry with them. So angry that he’s ignoring social niceties and the dictates of good manners.
    Which should lead you to ask, “What the heck did the Galatians do?” What did they do to make Paul this angry? What has gone wrong? What is at stake in this community and in this letter?
    The letter to the Galatians is a letter to Christian communities in crisis. Over the next several weeks, we are going to hear about what has happened in the Galatian churches and what has gone wrong.
    In the first verses of the letter, we can already see what Paul believes is at stake. He tells the Galatians they have deserted the gospel and turned to a false gospel. They are listening to the teachings of people who are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.

    Paul went to Galatia and preached the gospel there, creating communities of Christian believers. Now, the Galatians are following a new teaching, a different teaching, and Paul is very concerned about what they are doing.
    I read one interpretation of this letter that compared it to the sign you see when you return a rental car: “Warning: Severe Tire Damage! Do not back up!” What Paul is writing to the Galatians is, “Warning: Severe Theological Damage! Do not back up!” He is afraid that they are falling backward, losing the grace and good news that they have gained. He is warning them not to back up, not to go backwards.
    In the coming weeks, we will hear that Paul believes the gospel he preached is a gospel of grace and freedom, salvation and new life. That is what he wants the Galatians to hold onto. And as we study the letter to the Galatians, we will be reminded to hold onto the same good news. Amen.

Text

So I decided to preach a sermon series on the letter to the Galatians. We have six weeks of readings from Galatians going on right now, so I’m preaching my way through the letter. I’m going to post the sermons here, so if you’re interested, you can read them.

Text

My congregants keep hinting that my sermons are too short, but I’m just… I don’t know what to do with that information.

Text

meggannn:

i used to be so picky about what i post and reblog but it’s just slowly deteriorated into a state of “why not”

Yeah, I’m getting there.

(via cocoalover1956)

Source: meggannn

"Look, you’re a feminist who, in this particular case, made the non-feminist choice. That’s all. I assume it was the right choice for you, or you wouldn’t have done it, and that’s fine! But feminism is not, in fact, all about choosing your choice. It is mostly about recognizing when things are fucked up for women at the societal level, and talking about that, and trying to change it. So sometimes, even when a decision is right for you, you still need to recognize that you made that decision within a social context that overwhelmingly supports your choice, and punishes women who make a different one."

-

Why I Lose My Mind Every Time We Have the Name Conversation | Kate Harding (via brute-reason)

As a feminist who did not take my husband’s name (and, in many other cases, makes un-feminist choices), I really, really like this perspective. Feminism does and should support women’s choices, but our choices are not made in a vacuum and the real focus of feminism is the atmosphere in which we make those choices.

(via sociologique)

Source: kateharding.info

Text

everydayimpastoring:

image

This is me right now.

Source: everydayimpastoring

(via cocoalover1956)

Source: nowtasha